Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:546-554

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belenkie, I.
Right arrow Articles by Tyberg, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Belenkie, I.
Right arrow Articles by Tyberg, J. V.

(Circulation. 1995;92:546-554.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Effects of Aortic Constriction During Experimental Acute Right Ventricular Pressure Loading

Further Insights Into Diastolic and Systolic Ventricular Interaction

Israel Belenkie, MD; S. Gabrielle Horne, MD, PhD; Rosa Dani, MD; Eldon R. Smith, MD; John V. Tyberg, MD, PhD

From the Departments of Medicine and Medical Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr I. Belenkie, Foothills Hospital, 1403 29 St NW, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada.

Background Acute right ventricular (RV) hypertension may result in hemodynamic collapse. The associated reduction in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume is thought to result from reduced RV output (secondary to RV ischemia) and adverse direct ventricular interaction. Aortic constriction improves cardiac function in these circumstances; this has been attributed to a reversal of the RV ischemia caused by an increased coronary perfusion pressure. We hypothesized that altered ventricular interaction, potentially via altered septal mechanics, may also contribute to the beneficial effects of aortic constriction.

Methods and Results We instrumented nine dogs with ultrasonic dimension crystals to measure RV segment length, septum–to–RV free wall and septum–to–LV free wall diameters, and LV anteroposterior diameter. Catheter-tipped manometers were used to measure LV and RV pressures. Pericardial pressure was measured with flat, liquid-containing balloon transducers. Inflatable cuff constrictors were placed on the pulmonary artery (PA) and aorta, and a flow probe was placed on the PA. The right coronary artery (RCA) was perfused independently by a roller pump calibrated for flow. During moderate PA constriction, while RCA pressure was maintained at control level, RCA flow did not change significantly (15.8±6.2 to 16.9±11.5 mL/min) and was similar during severe PA constriction (18.6±9.8 mL/min). During severe PA constriction, RV stroke volume decreased from a control value of 10.3±4.9 to 2.3±1.4 mL/beat (P<.05). When aortic constriction was added while RCA pressure was maintained at control level, there was an increase in RV stroke volume to 4.5±2.0 mL/beat (P<.05) with no associated change in RCA flow (17.8±9.5 mL/min). However, pressure-dimension loops clearly demonstrated changes in diastolic and systolic ventricular interaction; with aortic constriction, there was a large increase in the transseptal pressure gradient associated with a rightward septal shift. During either isolated severe PA constriction or simultaneous severe PA and aortic constriction, RCA flow was increased until RCA pressure was approximately equal to that in the aorta. This produced an increase in RCA flow of 50% (P<.05); however, this increase in coronary flow was ineffective in improving any measure of RV function.

Conclusions In this model of acute RV hypertension, aortic constriction improves cardiac function, at least in part, by altering ventricular interaction independent of changes in RCA flow. Changes in RCA flow do not appear to have a significant impact on cardiac function in this model in which coronary artery pressure was maintained at normal or increased levels.


Key Words: pulmonary disease • hypertension • arteries




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
Y. Jeon, J. H. Ryu, Y. J. Lim, C. S. Kim, J.-H. Bahk, S. Z. Yoon, and J. Y. Choi
Comparative hemodynamic effects of vasopressin and norepinephrine after milrinone-induced hypotension in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgical patients.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 29(6): 952 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
U. P. Klima, M.-Y. Lee, J. L. Guerrero, P. J. LaRaia, R. A. Levine, and G. J. Vlahakes
Determinants of maximal right ventricular function: Role of septal shift
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2002; 123(1): 72 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Brookes, H. Ravn, P. White, U. Moeldrup, P. Oldershaw, and A. Redington
Acute Right Ventricular Dilatation in Response to Ischemia Significantly Impairs Left Ventricular Systolic Performance
Circulation, August 17, 1999; 100(7): 761 - 767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]