Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1995;92:1126-1132

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Botas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yeung, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Botas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Yeung, A. C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Transplantation

(Circulation. 1995;92:1126-1132.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Influence of Preexistent Donor Coronary Artery Disease on the Progression of Transplant Vasculopathy

An Intravascular Ultrasound Study

Javier Botas, MD; Fausto J. Pinto, MD; Adrian Chenzbraun, MD; David Liang, MD; John S. Schroeder, MD; Stephen N. Oesterle, MD; Edwin L. Alderman, MD; Richard L. Popp, MD; Alan C. Yeung, MD

From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine.

Correspondence to Alan C. Yeung, MD, Stanford University Medical Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, 300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305.

Background Transplant vasculopathy (TxCAD) limits long-term survival of allograft recipients. The possibility that preexistent donor coronary disease (PEDD) might accelerate this process is of concern. The serial progression of sites with and without PEDD as assessed by intravascular ultrasonic imaging is explored in this study.

Methods and Results Thirty patients with baseline intravascular imaging within 3 weeks of cardiac transplantation who had at least one annual follow-up study were included in this study. Vessel luminal area (LA), total area (TA), intimal index (II=TA-LA/TA), mean intimal thickness (MIT), and Stanford classification were expressed for each image site and for each patient at each study. Progression of sites and of patients with and without PEDD on the baseline study was compared. Patients with PEDD (n=9) still had significantly more intimal disease than those without PEDD (n=21) at the first follow-up study (MIT=0.35±0.13 versus 0.13±0.11 mm; II=0.29±0.11 versus 0.11±0.1; class=3.7±0.5 versus 2.2±0.94; P<.001 for all comparisons). However, the increase in intimal thickness during the 1- year interval was not significantly different between the two groups. In 4 patients in whom both types of sites were present, no difference in progression was found. Data were similar for patients and sites studied over >1 year.

Conclusions PEDD does not accelerate the progression of TxCAD within the first few years after cardiac transplantation. The pathophysiology of TxCAD is most likely immune mediated and does not seem to be accelerated by native coronary artery disease.


Key Words: transplantation • coronary disease • ultrasonics




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
K. J. Shea, N. A Sopko, K. Ludrosky, K. Hoercher, N. G. Smedira, D. O. Taylor, R. C. Starling, and G. V. Gonzalez-Stawinski
The effect of a donor's history of active substance on outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 31(3): 452 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
M. Rahmani, R. P. Cruz, D. J. Granville, and B. M. McManus
Allograft Vasculopathy Versus Atherosclerosis
Circ. Res., October 13, 2006; 99(8): 801 - 815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. Li, K. Tanaka, H. Anzai, B. Oeser, D. Lai, J. A. Kobashigawa, and J. M. Tobis
Influence of Pre-Existing Donor Atherosclerosis on the Development of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy and Outcomes in Heart Transplant Recipients
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 20, 2006; 47(12): 2470 - 2476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. J. Hauptman, K. J. O'Connor, R. E. Wolf, and B. J. McNeil
Angiography of potential cardiac donors
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 2001; 37(5): 1252 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. D. Knollmann, W. Bocksch, S. Spiegelsberger, R. Hetzer, R. Felix, and M. Hummel
Electron-Beam Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease After Heart Transplantation
Circulation, May 2, 2000; 101(17): 2078 - 2082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Rabago, A. Martin-Trenor, J.-L. Lopez Coronado, and J. Calabuig
Coronary angioplasty and stenting following heart transplantation with older donors.: Is this a rational approach?
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 1998; 13(2): 209 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Weis and W. von Scheidt
Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy : A Review
Circulation, September 16, 1997; 96(6): 2069 - 2077.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. J. Hauptman and K. J. O'Connor
Procurement and Allocation of Solid Organs for Transplantation
N. Engl. J. Med., February 6, 1997; 336(6): 422 - 431.
[Full Text] [PDF]