This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Braxton, J. H. Articles by Baldwin, J. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Braxton, J. H. Articles by Baldwin, J. C.

(Circulation. 1995;92:66-68.)
© 1995 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Optimal Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery After Acute Myocardial Infarction

John H. Braxton, MD; Graeme L. Hammond, MD; George V. Letsou, MD; Kenneth L. Franco, MD; Gary S. Kopf, MD; John A. Elefteriades, MD; John C. Baldwin, MD

From the Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn.

Correspondence to John H. Braxton, MD, Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, 333 Cedar St, 121 FMB, New Haven, CT 06520.

Background To assess optimal timing for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), all patients undergoing CABG without associated procedures at our institution from January 1, 1991, to July 30, 1992, were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on time from infarct to revascularization. The control group consisted of patients operated on for angina refractory to medical management. Relative risks (incident infarction group divided by incident control group) were established for need of vasopressors, new balloon to separate from bypass, perioperative myocardial infarction, and hospital mortality.

Methods and Results One hundred sixteen patients underwent CABG within 6 weeks of infarction. In the experimental group, 58 patients underwent CABG for non–Q-wave infarction, and 58 patients underwent CABG for Q-wave infarction. In the control group, 255 patients underwent surgery for angina without infarction. Patients were analyzed by group relative to the time between infarction and CABG. Patients were analyzed between infarction and CABG and assigned to one of three groups. Group 1 patients were revascularized within 48 hours; group 2, between 3 and 5 days; and group 3, after 5 days. Significance was determined by Fisher's exact or Mantel-Haenszel ² test where appropriate. Multivariate analysis was performed on statistics that were significant. All patients within all groups after Q-wave or non–Q-wave myocardial infarction had a significantly higher risk of needing an intra-aortic balloon pump and vasopressors to be weaned from bypass and a greater incidence of perioperative MI compared with control patients. Surgical mortality is highest immediately after Q-wave infarctions.

Conclusions Patients with non–Q-wave infarction may undergo CABG relatively safely at any time. Acceptable timing for CABG after Q-wave infarction is after 48 hours.

Key Words: bypass • myocardial infarction

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Spacek, P. Widimsky, Z. Straka, E. Jiresova, J. Dvorak, R. Polasek, I. Karel, R. Jirmar, L. Lisa, T. Budesinsky, et al. V_alue of First Day Angiography/Angioplasty I_n Evolving N_on-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An O_pen Multicenter Randomized Trial. The VINO Study Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2002; 23(3): 230 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Yamabe, I. Misumi, H. Fukushima, K. Ueno, Y. Kimura, and Y. Hokamura Electrophysiological Delineation of the Tachycardia Circuit in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia Circulation, August 10, 1999; 100(6): 621 - 627. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]