(Circulation. 1996;93:277-283.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
Effect of Slow Pathway Ablation on Ventricular Rate During Atrial Fibrillation
Dependence on Electrophysiological Properties of the Fast Pathway
From the Department of Cardiology, University of Vienna, Austria.
Correspondence to Gerhard Kreiner, MD, Klinik Innere Medizin II/Kardiologie, Allgemeines Krankenhaus/Universitätskliniken, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
Background Catheter ablation of the posteroseptal right atrium has been proposed for control of ventricular rate in patients with tachycardic atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the exact mechanism of rate control is unclear. Because the ablation site corresponds to the location of the slow pathway in patients with AV nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT), we investigated whether selective ablation of this posterior AV nodal input can provide a sufficient reduction in heart rate during AF.
Methods and Results In 30 patients with AVNRT, conduction properties of the AV nodal pathways were determined before and after slow pathway ablation. AF was induced by burst pacing at baseline and after ablation, and the mean ventricular cycle length was determined. After slow pathway ablation, the mean ventricular cycle length during AF increased (449±98 versus 515±129 milliseconds, P<.01). At baseline, the mean ventricular cycle length correlated with the Wenckebach cycle length of both the slow (r=.90) and fast (r=.86) pathways. After ablation, the mean ventricular cycle length was extremely well determined by the Wenckebach cycle length of the fast pathway (r=.94). However, the slope of the regression line was significantly steeper compared with baseline (1.50 versus 0.77, P<.0001), illustrating that the reduction in ventricular rate was not as evident if the fast pathway had a short Wenckebach cycle length.
Conclusions Selective elimination of the slow pathway reduces ventricular rate during AF. However, in patients with a short Wenckebach cycle length of the anterior AV nodal input that causes tachycardic AF, this effect may be insufficient to provide adequate control of ventricular rate.
Key Words: catheter ablation • tachyarrhythmias • heart rate • atrium • fibrillation
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  Y. Zhang, S. Bharati, K. A. Mowrey, and T. N. Mazgalev His Electrogram Alternans Reveal Dual Atrioventricular Nodal Pathway Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Slow-Pathway Modification Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 1059 - 1065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Rokas, S. Gaitanidou, S. Chatzidou, C. Pamboucas, D. Achtipis, and S. Stamatelopoulos Atrioventricular Node Modification in Patients With Chronic Atrial Fibrillation : Role of Morphology of RR Interval Variation Circulation, June 19, 2001; 103(24): 2942 - 2948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K.-C. Ueng, S.-H. Lee, D.-J. Wu, C.-S. Lin, M.-S. Chang, and S.-A. Chen Radiofrequency Catheter Modification of Atrioventricular Junction in Patients With COPD and Medically Refractory Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia* Chest, January 1, 2000; 117(1): 52 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Garrigue, K. A. Mowrey, G. Fahy, P. J. Tchou, and T. N. Mazgalev Atrioventricular Nodal Conduction During Atrial Fibrillation : Role of Atrial Input Modification Circulation, May 4, 1999; 99(17): 2323 - 2333. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Krahn, G. J. Klein, R. Yee, M. N. Basta, and J. K. Lee Progressive Anterior Ablation in the Coronary Sinus Region : Evidence to Support the Presence of a `Slow Pathway' Input in Normal Patients? Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3477 - 3483. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Markowitz, K. M. Stein, and B. B. Lerman Mechanism of Ventricular Rate Control After Radiofrequency Modification of Atrioventricular Conduction in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Circulation, December 1, 1996; 94(11): 2856 - 2864. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|