Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;93:1123-1132

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, K. G.
Right arrow Articles by Serruys, P. W.

(Circulation. 1996;93:1123-1132.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Contributions of Frequency Distribution Analysis to the Understanding of Coronary Restenosis

A Reappraisal of the Gaussian Curve

Kenneth G. Lehmann, MD; Rein Melkert, MD; Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD

From the Thoraxcenter (P.W.S.) and Cardialysis (R.M.), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands, and the University of Washington School of Medicine (K.G.L.), Seattle, Wash.

Correspondence to Kenneth G. Lehmann, MD, Section of Cardiology (111C), Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108.

Background Clinical restenosis after balloon angioplasty can be categorized by use of dichotomous terms based on the presence or absence of recurrent myocardial ischemia. In contrast, recent investigations have concluded that late luminal renarrowing, documented through angiographic imaging, occurs to a variable extent in nearly all stenoses. This process has been characterized by a gaussian or normal frequency distribution, with restenosis simply representing an extreme form of this delayed remodeling. In the current study, frequency distribution analysis was used to examine the process of coronary restenosis in a large cohort of patients at risk.

Methods and Results Quantitative coronary angiographic analysis was applied to 9279 cineangiograms obtained in 3093 patients before and immediately after angioplasty and after 6-month follow-up. Late loss, defined as the change in minimum lumen diameter of the target stenosis from postdilation to follow-up, did not statistically conform to a normal distribution (P<.0001 by both {chi}2 statistic and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test), even after the exclusion of the 236 stenoses that displayed total occlusions at follow-up angiography. Examination of deviations from a normal curve revealed an excessively high frequency of stenoses that experienced either little change (0.0±0.3 mm) or marked change (1.0 to 2.0 mm) in late loss, with a low frequency of stenoses with intermediate values (0.3 to 1.0 mm). Similarly, although the distribution of percent diameter stenosis of the target lesion was statistically normal immediately after dilation, this gaussian distribution disappeared during the follow-up period. Other angiographic indexes of restenosis also failed to approximate a normal curve. In an attempt to improve the goodness of fit, a probabilistic model of late loss was created on the basis of deconvolution of the observed data distribution. Two theoretical, discrete populations of stenoses were identified, one with and one without overall late luminal narrowing. Unlike the gaussian distribution, this model provided a good representation of the observed data (P=NS for lack of fit).

Conclusions The frequency distributions of angiographic indexes of restenosis often superficially resemble a gaussian curve, an appearance that is artifactually enhanced by the measurement imprecision of current quantitative techniques. Nevertheless, standard indexes of coronary restenosis fail to conform statistically to a normal distribution. The pattern of deviations observed supports the possible existence of discrete subpopulations of lesions, each with a different propensity toward the development of restenosis after coronary intervention.


Key Words: angioplasty • coronary disease • restenosis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. C.J. Sun, J. W. Eikelboom, P. Agostoni, G. M. Sangiorgi, G. G. Biondi-Zoccai, B. Scheller, M. Bohm, and E. Camenzind
Treatment of Restenosis with a Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter
N. Engl. J. Med., March 8, 2007; 356(10): 1071 - 1073.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. A. Lemos, N. Mercado, R. T. van Domburg, R. E. Kuntz, W. W. O'Neill, and P. W. Serruys
Comparison of Late Luminal Loss Response Pattern After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation or Conventional Stenting
Circulation, November 16, 2004; 110(20): 3199 - 3205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. A. Morrow, E. M. Antman, S. A. Murphy, S. F. Assmann, R. P. Giugliano, C. P. Cannon, C. Michael Gibson, C. H. McCabe, H. V. Barron, F. Van de Werf, et al.
The Risk Score Profile: a novel approach to characterising the risk of populations enrolled in clinical studies
Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2004; 25(13): 1139 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
K. Kwon, D. Choi, S.-H. Choi, Bon Kwon Koo, Y. Jang, W.-H. Shim, and S.-Y. Cho
Coronary Stenting After Rotational Atherectomy in Diffuse Lesions of the Small Coronary Artery: Comparison with Balloon Angioplasty Before Stenting
Angiology, July 1, 2003; 54(4): 423 - 431.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W. R. P. Agema, J. W. Jukema, S. N. Pimstone, and J. J. P. Kastelein
Genetic aspects of restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions;towards more tailored therapy
Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2001; 22(22): 2058 - 2074.
[PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S E Francis, N J Camp, A J Burton, R M Dewberry, J Gunn, A Stephens-Lloyd, D C Cumberland, A Gershlick, and D C Crossman
Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist gene polymorphism and restenosis after coronary angioplasty
Heart, September 1, 2001; 86(3): 336 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, J. Dirschinger, J. Mehilli, F. Dotzer, N. von Welser, and F.-J. Neumann
A Randomized Trial Comparing Stenting With Balloon Angioplasty in Small Vessels in Patients With Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease
Circulation, November 21, 2000; 102(21): 2593 - 2598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Gyongyosi, P. Yang, A. Khorsand, D. Glogar, on behalf of the Austrian Wiktor Stent Study Group, and European Paragon Stent Investigators
Longitudinal straightening effect of stents is an additional predictor for major adverse cardiac events
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2000; 35(6): 1580 - 1589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Buffon, G. Liuzzo, L. M. Biasucci, P. Pasqualetti, V. Ramazzotti, A. G. Rebuzzi, F. Crea, and A. Maseri
Preprocedural serum levels of C-reactive protein predict early complications and late restenosis after coronary angioplasty
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 1, 1999; 34(5): 1512 - 1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Kastrati, A. Schomig, S. Elezi, H. Schuhlen, M. Wilhelm, and J. Dirschinger
Interlesion Dependence of the Risk for Restenosis in Patients With Coronary Stent Placement in Multiple Lesions
Circulation, June 23, 1998; 97(24): 2396 - 2401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Schomig, A. Kastrati, S. Elezi, H. Schuhlen, J. Dirschinger, F. Dannegger, M. Wilhelm, and K. Ulm
Bimodal Distribution of Angiographic Measures of Restenosis Six Months After Coronary Stent Placement
Circulation, December 2, 1997; 96(11): 3880 - 3887.
[Abstract] [Full Text]