(Circulation. 1996;94:452-459.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Cardiac Ultrasound Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (D.G., M.D.H., L.J., E.M., A.E.W., R.A.L.); Children's Hospital, School of Medicine and Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pa (E.G.C., J.T.S.); Hewlett-Packard Co, Andover, Mass (S.M.M.-J.); and Santin Engineering, Peabody, Mass (C.S., J.S.).
Background Three-dimensional echocardiography can allow us to address uniquely three-dimensional scientific questions, for example, the hypothesis that the impact of a stenotic valve depends not only on its limiting orifice area but also on its three-dimensional geometry proximal to the orifice. This can affect the coefficient of orifice contraction (Cc=effective/anatomic area), which is important because for a given flow rate and anatomic area, a lower Cc gives a higher velocity and pressure gradient, and Cc, routinely assumed constant in the Gorlin equation, may vary with valve shape (60% for a flat plate, 100% for a tube). To date, it has not been possible to study this with actual valve shapes in patients.
Methods and Results Three-dimensional echocardiography reconstructed valve geometries typical of the spectrum in patients with mitral stenosis: mobile doming, intermediate conical, and relatively flat immobile valves. Each geometry was constructed with orifice areas of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 cm2 by stereolithography (computerized laser polymerization) (total, nine valves) and studied at physiological flow rates. Cc varied prominently with shape and was larger for the longer, tapered dome (more gradual flow convergence proximal and distal to the limiting orifice): for an anatomic orifice of 1.5 cm2, Cc increased from 0.73 (flat) to 0.87 (dome), and for an area of 0.5 cm2, from 0.62 to 0.75. For each shape, Cc increased with increasing orifice size relative to the proximal funnel (more tubelike). These variations translated into important differences of up to 40% in pressure gradient for the same anatomic area and flow rate (greatest for the flattest valves), with a corresponding variation in calculated Gorlin area (an effective area) relative to anatomic values.
Conclusions The coefficient of contraction and the related net pressure loss are importantly affected by the variations in leaflet geometry seen in patients with mitral stenosis. Three-dimensional echocardiography and stereolithography, with the use of actual information from patients, can address such uniquely three-dimensional questions to provide insight into the relations between cardiac structure, pressure, and flows.
Key Words: echocardiography mitral valve stenosis pressure
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. M. Ngan, I. M. Rebeyka, D. B. Ross, M. Hirji, J. F. Wolfaardt, R. Seelaus, A. Grosvenor, and M. L. Noga The rapid prototyping of anatomic models in pulmonary atresia J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2006; 132(2): 264 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Gabriel, O. Kamp, and C. A. Visser Three-dimensional echocardiography in mitral valve disease Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2005; 6(6): 443 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gilon, E. G. Cape, M. D. Handschumacher, J.-K. Song, J. Solheim, M. VanAuker, M. E. E. King, and R. A. Levine Effect of three-dimensional valve shape on the hemodynamics of aortic stenosis: Three-dimensional echocardiographic stereolithography and patient studies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1479 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. S. Salgo, J. H. Gorman III, R. C. Gorman, B. M. Jackson, F. W. Bowen, T. Plappert, M. G. St John Sutton, and L. H. Edmunds Jr Effect of Annular Shape on Leaflet Curvature in Reducing Mitral Leaflet Stress Circulation, August 6, 2002; 106(6): 711 - 717. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Sutaria, D Northridge, N Masani, and N Pandian Three dimensional echocardiography for the assessment of mitral valve disease Heart, November 1, 2000; 84(90002): 7i - 10. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |