(Circulation. 1996;94:1561-1566.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston (S.D.P.); the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Heart Care Program, Ann Arbor (K.A.E.); the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School (K.M.K.); and the Department of Vascular Medicine (J.R.Y.) and Vascular Surgery (N.R.H.), Cleveland (Ohio) Clinic Foundation.
Correspondence to Sumita D. Paul, MD, MPH, Cardiovascular Division, TIMI Chairman's Office, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115.
Background Preoperative clinical indexes to stratify cardiac risk have not been validated angiographically. Our aims were to determine the concordance of clinical risk with severity of coronary stenosis and to develop and validate a preoperative clinical index to exclude the presence of significant coronary stenosis.
Methods and Results We carried out a prospective study of 878 consecutive patients (including the derivation and validation sets). "Severe" stenosis was defined as three-vessel (
50% stenosis in each), two-vessel (
50% stenosis in one when the other is
70% stenosis of the left anterior descending), or left main disease (
50%); "critical" stenosis was three-vessel (
70% stenosis in each) and/or left main stenosis
70%. A preoperative clinical index (diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, angina, age >70 years, congestive heart failure) was used to stratify patients. A gradient of risk for severe stenosis was seen with increasing numbers of clinical markers. The following prediction rules were developed: The absence of severe coronary stenoses can be predicted with a positive predictive value of 96% for patients who have no (1) history of diabetes, (2) prior angina, (3) previous myocardial infarction, or (4) history of congestive heart failure. The absence of critical coronary stenoses can be predicted with a positive predictive value of 94% for those who have no (1) prior angina, (2) previous myocardial infarction, or (3) history of congestive heart failure.
Conclusions By reliably identifying a large proportion of patients with a low likelihood of significant stenoses, these prediction rules can help to substantially reduce healthcare costs associated with preoperative cardiac risk assessment for noncardiac surgery.
Key Words: surgery angiography risk factors cardiovascular diseases peripheral vascular disease
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V Russo, V Gostoli, L Lovato, M Montalti, A Marzocchi, G Gavelli, A Branzi, R Di Bartolomeo, and R Fattori Clinical value of multidetector CT coronary angiography as a preoperative screening test before non-coronary cardiac surgery Heart, December 1, 2007; 93(12): 1591 - 1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Back, D. C. Schmacht, A. N. Bowser, N. Stordahl, D. Cuthbertson, B. L. Johnson, and D. F. Bandyk Critical Appraisal of Cardiac Risk Stratification Before Elective Vascular Surgery Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, November 1, 2003; 37(6): 387 - 397. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-G. Chassot, A. Delabays, and D. R. Spahn Preoperative evaluation of patients with, or at risk of, coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2002; 89(5): 747 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B Froehlich and K. A Eagle Anaesthesia and the cardiac patient: the patient versus the procedure Heart, January 1, 2002; 87(1): 91 - 96. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Mathes The Preoperative Evaluation of the Patient With Cardiac Risk Factors for Noncardiac Surgery: Which Patients Need Further Cardiac Risk Stratification Tests? Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, July 1, 2001; 5(2): 154 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mantha Rational Cardiac Risk Stratification Before Peripheral Vascular Surgery: Application of Evidence-Based Medicine and Bayesian Analysis Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 198 - 212. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Foss Preoperative Evaluation of the Patient for Vascular Surgery in the "Real World" Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, November 1, 2000; 4(4): 213 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Das, P. A. Pellikka, D. W. Mahoney, V. L. Roger, J. K. Oh, R. B. McCully, and J. B. Seward Assessment of cardiac risk before nonvascular surgery: Dobutamine stress echocardiography in 530 patients J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2000; 35(6): 1647 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Rihal, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, P. Guo, N. M. Keller, R. Jandova, M. A. Sellers, H. V. Schaff, and D. R. Holmes Jr Increased Incidence of Periprocedural Complications Among Patients With Peripheral Vascular Disease Undergoing Myocardial Revascularization in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Circulation, July 13, 1999; 100(2): 171 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bartels, J. F. M. Bechtel, V. Hossmann, and S. Horsch Cardiac Risk Stratification for High-Risk Vascular Surgery Circulation, June 3, 1997; 95(11): 2473 - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Preoperative Identification of CAD Risk Journal Watch Cardiology, December 19, 1996; 1996(1219): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Eagle and J. B. Froehlich Reducing Cardiovascular Risk in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., December 5, 1996; 335(23): 1761 - 1763. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1996 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |