This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nugue, O. Articles by Ducloux, G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nugue, O. Articles by Ducloux, G. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Endoscopy

(Circulation. 1996;94:1635-1641.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Pericardioscopy in the Etiologic Diagnosis of Pericardial Effusion in 141 Consecutive Patients

Olivier Nugue, MD; Alain Millaire, MD, PhD; Henri Porte, MD; Pascal de Groote, MD; Philippe Guimier, MD; Alain Wurtz, MD; Gerard Ducloux, MD

the C Division of Cardiology (O.N., A.M., P. de G., P.G., G.D.), Heart Hospital, and the Division of Thoracic Surgery (H.P., A.W.), Calmette Hospital, University of Lille, France.

Correspondence to Alain Millaire, MD, PhD, Service de Cardiologie C Hopital Cardiologique, Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire, Bld du Pr Leclercq, 59037 Lille Cedex, France.

Background Although previous small series have documented the utility of pericardioscopy for accurate etiologic diagnosis of pericardial effusion, this technique remains underused. The aim of our study was to assess the benefits and risks of surgical pericardioscopy in a large prospective series.

Methods and Results One hundred forty-one consecutive patients with unexplained pericardial effusion underwent 142 pericardioscopies with a rigid mediastinoscope. For each patient, the etiologic data obtained by pericardioscopy (visualization of pericardium, guided biopsies, subxiphoid window biopsy, and fluid analysis) were compared with the results that would have been obtained with only conventional surgical drainage and biopsy (subxiphoid window biopsy and fluid analysis). After complete workup, a specific cause was found in 69 cases (48.6%); the other 73 cases were considered idiopathic effusions (51.4%). Procedural and in-hospital mortality was 8 of 141 patients (5.6%). No death was directly attributable to pericardioscopy. During long-term follow-up (median duration, 24 months; range, 6 to 96), a previously unrecognized cause was discovered in 6 patients (4%). By comparing the areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves, the diagnostic advantage of pericardioscopy was significant for the whole series (pericardioscopy, 0.98±0.011; conventional surgical drainage, 0.89±0.029; P<.001). The increase in sensitivity was more marked for some types such as neoplastic (21%), radiation-induced (100%), or purulent (83%) effusions.

Conclusions Our data demonstrate that pericardioscopy increases the diagnostic sensitivity of surgical pericardial drainage and biopsy without specific risk.

Key Words: pericarditis • pericardium • diagnosis • surgery • biopsy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. C. Little and G. L. Freeman Pericardial Disease Circulation, March 28, 2006; 113(12): 1622 - 1632. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Task Force members, B. Maisch, P. M. Seferovic, A. D. Ristic, R. Erbel, R. Rienmuller, Y. Adler, W. Z. Tomkowski, G. Thiene, M. H. Yacoub, et al. Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases Executive Summary: The Task Force on the Diagnosis and Management of Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2004; 25(7): 587 - 610. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Maisch and A. D Ristic Practical aspects of the management of pericardial disease Heart, September 1, 2003; 89(9): 1096 - 1103. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Wurtz Remarks about usefulness of videothoracoscopic intrapericardial examination of pulmonary vessels to assess the resectability of clinical T4 lung cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 76(1): 342 - 342. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. Seferovic, A. D. Ristic, R. Maksimovic, V. Tatic, M. Ostojic, and V. Kanjuh Diagnostic Value of Pericardial Biopsy: Improvement With Extensive Sampling Enabled by Pericardioscopy Circulation, February 25, 2003; 107(7): 978 - 983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Loscertales, R. Jimenez-Merchan, M. Congregado-Loscertales, C. Arenas-Linares, J. C. Giron-Arjona, A. A. Tristan, and J. Ayarra Usefulness of videothoracoscopic intrapericardial examination of pulmonary vessels to identify resectable clinical T4 lung cancer Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2002; 73(5): 1563 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. R Gibbs, R. D S Watson, S. P Singh, and G. Y H Lip Management of pericardial effusion by drainage: a survey of 10 years' experience in a city centre general hospital serving a multiracial population Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2000; 76(902): 809 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				H. L. Porte, T. J. Janecki-Delebecq, L. Finzi, D. G. Metois, A. Millaire, and A. J. Wurtz Pericardoscopy for primary management of pericardial effusion in cancer patients Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 1999; 16(3): 287 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]