Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1996;94:1768-1773

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yamanouchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tchou, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yamanouchi, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Tchou, P. J.

(Circulation. 1996;94:1768-1773.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Large Change in Voltage at Phase Reversal Improves Biphasic Defibrillation Thresholds

Parallel-Series Mode Switching

Yoshio Yamanouchi, MD; Kent A. Mowrey, MS; George R. Nadzam; Donald G. Hills; Mark W. Kroll, PhD; James E. Brewer, MS; Ann M. Donohoo, MS; Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD; Patrick J. Tchou, MD

the Department of Cardiology, Cleveland (Ohio) Clinic Foundation (Y.Y., K.A.M., G.R.N., D.G.H., B.L.W., P.J.T.), and Angeion Corporation (M.W.K., J.E.B., A.M.D.), Plymouth, Minn.

Correspondence to Patrick J. Tchou, MD, Director, Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, Department of Cardiology/F15, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail TCHOUP@cesmtp.ccf.ORG.

Background Multiple factors contribute to an improved defibrillation threshold of biphasic shocks. The leading-edge voltage of the second phase may be an important factor in reducing the defibrillation threshold.

Methods and Results We tested two experimental biphasic waveforms with large voltage changes at phase reversal. The phase 2 leading-edge voltage was twice the phase 1 trailing-edge voltage. This large voltage change was achieved by switching two capacitors from parallel to series mode at phase reversal. Two capacitors were tested (60/15 microfarads [µF] and 90/22.5 µF) and compared with two control biphasic waveforms for which the phase 1 trailing-edge voltage equaled the phase 2 leading-edge voltage. The control waveforms were incorporated into clinical (135/135 µF) or investigational devices (90/90 µF). Defibrillation threshold parameters were evaluated in eight anesthetized pigs by use of a nonthoracotomy transvenous lead to a can electrode system. The stored energy at the defibrillation threshold (in joules) was 8.2±1.5 for 60/15 µF (P<.01 versus 135/135 µF and 90/90 µF), 8.8±2.4 for 90/22.5 µF (P<.01 versus 135/135 µF and 90/90 µF), 12.5±3.4 for 135/135 µF, and 12.6±2.6 for 90/90 µF.

Conclusions The biphasic waveform with large voltage changes at phase reversal caused by parallel-series mode switching appeared to improve the ventricular defibrillation threshold in a pig model compared with a currently available biphasic waveform. The 60/15-µF capacitor performed as well as the 90/22.5-µF capacitor in the experimental waveform. Thus, smaller capacitors may allow reduction in device size without sacrificing defibrillation threshold energy requirements.


Key Words: defibrillation • ventricles • electrical stimulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
K. A. Mowrey, Y. Cheng, P. J. Tchou, and I. R. Efimov
Kinetics of defibrillation shock-induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform
Europace, January 1, 2002; 4(1): 27 - 39.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Yamanouchi, J. E. Brewer, K. F. Olson, K. A. Mowrey, T. N. Mazgalev, B. L. Wilkoff, and P. J. Tchou
Fully Discharging Phases : A New Approach to Biphasic Waveforms for External Defibrillation
Circulation, August 24, 1999; 100(8): 826 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. N. Schauerte, K. Ziegert, M. Waldmann, F. A. Schondube, F. Birkenhauer, K. Mischke, M. Grossmann, P. Hanrath, and C. Stellbrink
Effect of Biphasic Shock Duration on Defibrillation Threshold With Different Electrode Configurations and Phase 2 Capacitances : Prediction by Upper-Limit-of-Vulnerability Determination
Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1516 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Yamanouchi, J. E. Brewer, K. A. Mowrey, A. M. Donohoo, B. L. Wilkoff, and P. J. Tchou
Optimal Small-Capacitor Biphasic Waveform for External Defibrillation : Influence of Phase-1 Tilt and Phase-2 Voltage
Circulation, December 1, 1998; 98(22): 2487 - 2493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
X. Zhou, W. M. Smith, R. K. Justice, J. L. Wayland, and R. E. Ideker
Transmembrane potential changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 1998; 275(5): H1798 - H1807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Schauerte, F. A. Schondube, M. Grossmann, H. Dorge, F. Stein, B. Dohmen, A. Moumen, K. Erena, B. J. Messmer, P. Hanrath, et al.
Influence of Phase Duration of Biphasic Waveforms on Defibrillation Energy Requirements With a 70-µF Capacitance
Circulation, May 26, 1998; 97(20): 2073 - 2078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Y. Yamanouchi, K. A. Mowrey, M. J. Niebauer, P. J. Tchou, and B. L. Wilkoff
Additional Lead Improves Defibrillation Efficacy With an Abdominal `Hot Can' Electrode System
Circulation, December 16, 1997; 96(12): 4400 - 4407.
[Abstract] [Full Text]