Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1997;96:1351-1359

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ideker, R. E.

(Circulation. 1997;96:1351-1359.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.


Articles

Effects of Transvenous Electrode Polarity and Waveform Duration on the Relationship Between Defibrillation Threshold and Upper Limit of Vulnerability

Jian Huang, MD; Bruce H. KenKnight, MS; Gregory P. Walcott, MD; Dennis L. Rollins, MS; William M. Smith, PhD; ; Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD

From the Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc, a Division of Guidant Corp, St Paul, Minn (B.H.K.).

Correspondence to Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD, Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, Volker Hall B140, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019. E-mail rei{at}crml.uab.edu

Background The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) hypothesis for defibrillation predicts that maneuvers that alter the ULV will cause a similar alteration in the defibrillation threshold (DFT). The purpose of this study was to test this prediction by evaluating the effects of electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between the DFT and the ULV.

Methods and Results Platinum spring electrodes were placed in the right ventricular (RV) apex and the superior vena cava in 12 pigs. Strength-duration curves were constructed for the DFT and ULV for each electrode polarity with monophasic waveforms (6 pigs) of different durations (2 to 14 ms) and biphasic truncated exponential waveforms (6 pigs) having phase 1 equal to 4 ms and phase 2 of different durations (0 to 10 ms). ULV data were gathered by scanning of the T wave. The ventricular pacing threshold (VPT) and ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) were also determined with these same waveforms. For the RV electrode as a cathode for monophasic and the first phase of biphasic stimuli, VPTs for the same waveform duration were significantly lower than for the configuration with the RV electrode as an anode. VFTs were not significantly different for the two electrode polarities with either monophasic or biphasic waveforms. The DFT changed in a fashion similar to the ULV with changes in electrode polarity and phase duration for both monophasic and biphasic waveforms. The ULV and DFT for each waveform duration for each polarity were strongly correlated (r=.83 to .99).

Conclusions The almost identical changes in ULV and DFT with changes in electrode polarity and waveform duration provide new evidence to support the ULV hypothesis of defibrillation.


Key Words: defibrillation • electrical stimulation • fibrillation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
B. Rodriguez, L. Li, J. C. Eason, I. R. Efimov, and N. A. Trayanova
Differences Between Left and Right Ventricular Chamber Geometry Affect Cardiac Vulnerability to Electric Shocks
Circ. Res., July 22, 2005; 97(2): 168 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Huang, J. M. Rogers, C. R. Killingsworth, G. P. Walcott, B. H. KenKnight, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker
Improvement of Defibrillation Efficacy and Quantification of Activation Patterns During Ventricular Fibrillation in a Canine Heart Failure Model
Circulation, March 13, 2001; 103(10): 1473 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. Chattipakorn, J. M. Rogers, and R. E. Ideker
Influence of Postshock Epicardial Activation Patterns on Initiation of Ventricular Fibrillation by Upper Limit of Vulnerability Shocks
Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1329 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. N. Schauerte, K. Ziegert, M. Waldmann, F. A. Schondube, F. Birkenhauer, K. Mischke, M. Grossmann, P. Hanrath, and C. Stellbrink
Effect of Biphasic Shock Duration on Defibrillation Threshold With Different Electrode Configurations and Phase 2 Capacitances : Prediction by Upper-Limit-of-Vulnerability Determination
Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1516 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]