(Circulation. 1997;96:1351-1359.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.
Articles |
From the Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc, a Division of Guidant Corp, St Paul, Minn (B.H.K.).
Correspondence to Raymond E. Ideker, MD, PhD, Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, Volker Hall B140, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL 35294-0019. E-mail rei{at}crml.uab.edu
Background The upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) hypothesis for defibrillation predicts that maneuvers that alter the ULV will cause a similar alteration in the defibrillation threshold (DFT). The purpose of this study was to test this prediction by evaluating the effects of electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between the DFT and the ULV.
Methods and Results Platinum spring electrodes were placed in the right ventricular (RV) apex and the superior vena cava in 12 pigs. Strength-duration curves were constructed for the DFT and ULV for each electrode polarity with monophasic waveforms (6 pigs) of different durations (2 to 14 ms) and biphasic truncated exponential waveforms (6 pigs) having phase 1 equal to 4 ms and phase 2 of different durations (0 to 10 ms). ULV data were gathered by scanning of the T wave. The ventricular pacing threshold (VPT) and ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) were also determined with these same waveforms. For the RV electrode as a cathode for monophasic and the first phase of biphasic stimuli, VPTs for the same waveform duration were significantly lower than for the configuration with the RV electrode as an anode. VFTs were not significantly different for the two electrode polarities with either monophasic or biphasic waveforms. The DFT changed in a fashion similar to the ULV with changes in electrode polarity and phase duration for both monophasic and biphasic waveforms. The ULV and DFT for each waveform duration for each polarity were strongly correlated (r=.83 to .99).
Conclusions The almost identical changes in ULV and DFT with changes in electrode polarity and waveform duration provide new evidence to support the ULV hypothesis of defibrillation.
Key Words: defibrillation electrical stimulation fibrillation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Rodriguez, L. Li, J. C. Eason, I. R. Efimov, and N. A. Trayanova Differences Between Left and Right Ventricular Chamber Geometry Affect Cardiac Vulnerability to Electric Shocks Circ. Res., July 22, 2005; 97(2): 168 - 175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Huang, J. M. Rogers, C. R. Killingsworth, G. P. Walcott, B. H. KenKnight, W. M. Smith, and R. E. Ideker Improvement of Defibrillation Efficacy and Quantification of Activation Patterns During Ventricular Fibrillation in a Canine Heart Failure Model Circulation, March 13, 2001; 103(10): 1473 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Chattipakorn, J. M. Rogers, and R. E. Ideker Influence of Postshock Epicardial Activation Patterns on Initiation of Ventricular Fibrillation by Upper Limit of Vulnerability Shocks Circulation, March 21, 2000; 101(11): 1329 - 1336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. N. Schauerte, K. Ziegert, M. Waldmann, F. A. Schondube, F. Birkenhauer, K. Mischke, M. Grossmann, P. Hanrath, and C. Stellbrink Effect of Biphasic Shock Duration on Defibrillation Threshold With Different Electrode Configurations and Phase 2 Capacitances : Prediction by Upper-Limit-of-Vulnerability Determination Circulation, March 23, 1999; 99(11): 1516 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1997 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |