This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thrush, D. N. Articles by Smith, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thrush, D. N. Articles by Smith, R. A.

(Circulation. 1997;96:2709-2714.)
© 1997 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Is Epinephrine Contraindicated During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?

David N. Thrush, MD; John B. Downs, MD; ; Robert A. Smith, MS, RRT

From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa.

Background Why pulmonary gas exchange deteriorates after administration of epinephrine during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is unclear.

Methods and Results Forty-four anesthetized swine received an infusion of six inert gases. Animals underwent ventricular fibrillation with CPR and intravenous administration of saline (control), epinephrine (15 µg/kg), or methoxamine (150 µg/kg). Cardiac output, aortic blood pressure, pH, and arterial oxygen saturation were recorded. Distributions of A and were determined by the multiple inert gas elimination technique. Ventricular fibrillation and CPR caused significant decreases in cardiac output, aortic blood pressure, and arterial pH. With epinephrine (versus saline), diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher (23±7 versus 8±4 mm Hg), but the increase in shunt (from 7±4% to 29±17%) and the reduction in SaO₂ (from 99.7% to 76.8%) were significantly larger. Also, the increase in dead space was greater and elimination of CO₂ less. There were no differences between animals given methoxamine or saline, except for increased diastolic blood pressure.

Conclusions During experimental ventricular fibrillation and CPR, epinephrine increased intrapulmonary shunt 300% more than saline or methoxamine and significantly reduced arterial oxygen saturation. We suspect that the ß-adrenergic receptor activity of epinephrine attenuated hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. Methoxamine is as effective a pressor as epinephrine for CPR and devoid of ß-adrenergic activity. We recommend that such an agent be considered, instead of epinephrine, for CPR.

Key Words: methoxamine • cardiopulmonary resuscitation • epinephrine • fibrillation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				I. Matok, M. Rubinshtein, A. Levy, A. Vardi, L. Leibovitch, D. Mishali, Z. Barzilay, and G. Paret Terlipressin for Children with Extremely Low Cardiac Output After Open Heart Surgery Ann. Pharmacother., March 1, 2009; 43(3): 423 - 429. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Wenzel and K. H. Lindner Employing vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and vasodilatory shock as a lifesaving vasopressor Cardiovasc Res, August 15, 2001; 51(3): 529 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Naganobu, Y. Hasebe, Y. Uchiyama, M. Hagio, and H. Ogawa A Comparison of Distilled Water and Normal Saline as Diluents for Endobronchial Administration of Epinephrine in the Dog Anesth. Analg., August 1, 2000; 91(2): 317 - 321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]