Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1998;97:1157-1163

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mannheimer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hjalmarsson, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mannheimer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hjalmarsson, A.

(Circulation. 1998;97:1157-1163.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.


Clinical Investigation and Reports

Electrical Stimulation Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in Severe Angina Pectoris

The ESBY Study

Clas Mannheimer, MD, PhD; Tore Eliasson, MD, PhD; Lars-Erik Augustinsson, MD, PhD; Christian Blomstrand, MD, PhD; Håkan Emanuelsson, MD, PhD; Sture Larsson, MD, PhD; Henrik Norrsell, MD; ; Åke Hjalmarsson, MD, PhD

From the Multidisciplinary Pain Centre (C.M., T.E., H.N.), Department of Medicine, Östra Hospital and the Departments of Neurosurgery (L.-E.A.), Neurology (C.B.), Cardiology (H.E., A.H.), and Thoracic Surgery (S.L.), Sahlgren's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Background—Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been shown to have antianginal and anti-ischemic effects in severe angina pectoris. The present study was performed to investigate whether SCS can be used as an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in selected patient groups, ie, patients with no proven prognostic benefit from CABG and with an increased surgical risk.

Methods and Results—One hundred four patients were randomized (SCS, 53; CABG, 51). The patients were assessed with respect to symptoms, exercise capacity, ischemic ECG changes during exercise, rate-pressure product, mortality, and cardiovascular morbidity before and 6 months after the operation. Both groups had adequate symptom relief (P<.0001), and there was no difference between SCS and CABG. The CABG group had an increase in exercise capacity (P=.02), less ST-segment depression on maximum (P=.005) and comparable (P=.0009) workloads, and an increase in the rate-pressure product both at maximum (P=.0003) and comparable (P=.03) workloads compared with the SCS group. Eight deaths occurred during the follow-up period, 7 in the CABG group and 1 in the SCS group. On an intention-to-treat basis, the mortality rate was lower in the SCS group (P=.02). Cerebrovascular morbidity was also lower in the SCS group (P=.03).

Conclusions—CABG and SCS appear to be equivalent methods in terms of symptom relief in this group of patients. Effects on ischemia, morbidity, and mortality should be considered in the choice of treatment method. Taking all factors into account, it seems reasonable to conclude that SCS may be a therapeutic alternative for patients with an increased risk of surgical complications.


Key Words: bypass • angina • electrical stimulation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. C. Lopshire, X. Zhou, C. Dusa, T. Ueyama, J. Rosenberger, N. Courtney, M. Ujhelyi, T. Mullen, M. Das, and D. P. Zipes
Spinal Cord Stimulation Improves Ventricular Function and Reduces Ventricular Arrhythmias in a Canine Postinfarction Heart Failure Model
Circulation, July 28, 2009; 120(4): 286 - 294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care PainHome page
J. H. Raphael, H. S. Mutagi, and S. Kapur
Spinal cord stimulation and its anaesthetic implications
CEACCP, June 1, 2009; 9(3): 78 - 81.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. Fricke, S. Eckert, A. Dongas, H. Fricke, R. Preuss, O. Lindner, D. Horstkotte, and W. Burchert
Myocardial Sympathetic Innervation in Patients with Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease: Follow-up After 1 Year with Neurostimulation
J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2008; 49(9): 1458 - 1464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
X. Ding, J. L. Ardell, F. Hua, R. J. McAuley, K. Sutherly, J. J Daniel, and C. A. Williams
Modulation of cardiac ischemia-sensitive afferent neuron signaling by preemptive C2 spinal cord stimulation: effect on substance P release from rat spinal cord
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2008; 294(1): R93 - R101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
M. J Johnson
Management of end stage cardiac failure
Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2007; 83(980): 395 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G. A Lanza
Alternative treatments for angina
Heart, May 1, 2007; 93(5): 544 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
G. Angelo Sgueglia, A. Sestito, A. Spinelli, B. Cioni, F. Infusino, F. Papacci, F. Bellocci, M. Meglio, F. Crea, and G. Antonio Lanza
Long-term follow-up of patients with cardiac syndrome X treated by spinal cord stimulation
Heart, May 1, 2007; 93(5): 591 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S. Eddicks, K. Maier-Hauff, M. Schenk, A. Muller, G. Baumann, and H. Theres
Thoracic spinal cord stimulation improves functional status and relieves symptoms in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the first placebo-controlled randomised study
Heart, May 1, 2007; 93(5): 585 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. Lapenna, D. Rapati, P. Cardano, M. De Bonis, F. Lullo, A. Zangrillo, and O. Alfieri
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients With Refractory Angina and Previous Coronary Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2006; 82(5): 1704 - 1708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. McNab, S. N. Khan, L. D. Sharples, J. Y. Ryan, C. Freeman, N. Caine, S. Tait, I. Hardy, and P. M. Schofield
An open label, single-centre, randomized trial of spinal cord stimulation vs. percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization in patients with refractory angina pectoris: the SPiRiT trial
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2006; 27(9): 1048 - 1053.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. E. Nordrehaug and M. Salem
Treatment of chronic refractory angina pectoris--light at the end of the tunnel?
Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2006; 27(9): 1007 - 1009.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
Z. F. Issa, X. Zhou, M. R. Ujhelyi, J. Rosenberger, D. Bhakta, W. J. Groh, J. M. Miller, and D. P. Zipes
Thoracic Spinal Cord Stimulation Reduces the Risk of Ischemic Ventricular Arrhythmias in a Postinfarction Heart Failure Canine Model
Circulation, June 21, 2005; 111(24): 3217 - 3220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
G. A. Lanza, A. Sestito, G. A. Sgueglia, F. Infusino, F. Papacci, M. Visocchi, C. Ierardi, M. Meglio, F. Bellocci, and F. Crea
Effect of spinal cord stimulation on spontaneous and stress-induced angina and 'ischemia-like' ST-segment depression in patients with cardiac syndrome X
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 983 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Andrell, C. Jensen, H. Norrsell, O. Ekre, S. Ekholm, U. Norrsell, T. Eliasson, C. Mannheimer, and C. Blomstrand
White Matter Disease in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Cerebral Complications After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 79(1): 74 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
E. H. Yang, G. W. Barsness, B. J. Gersh, K. Chandrasekaran, and A. Lerman
Current and Future Treatment Strategies for Refractory Angina
Mayo Clin. Proc., October 1, 2004; 79(10): 1284 - 1292.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. A. P. van der Sloot, M. Huikeshoven, R. Tukkie, H. J. Verberne, J. van der Meulen, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, M. J. C. van Gemert, J. G. P. Tijssen, and J. F. Beek
Transmyocardial revascularization using an XeCl excimer laser: Results of a randomized trial
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2004; 78(3): 875 - 881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
N. Svorkdal
Treatment of Inoperable Coronary Disease and Refractory Angina: Spinal Stimulators, Epidurals, Gene Therapy, Transmyocardial Laser, and Counterpulsation
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 2004; 8(1): 43 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. F. Beek, J. A. P. van der Sloot, M. Huikeshoven, H. J. Verberne, B. L. F. van Eck-Smit, J. van der Meulen, J. G. P. Tijssen, M. J. C. van Gemert, and R. Tukkie
Cardiac denervation after clinical transmyocardial laser revascularization: Short-term and long-term iodine 123-labeled meta-iodobenzylguanide scintigraphic evidence
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2004; 127(2): 517 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
L. Lam and S. Mahmood
Enhanced External Counterpulsation
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, March 1, 2003; 11(1): 92 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Andersen
Electrical stimulation vs CAB
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2002; 23(24): 1896 - 1897.
[PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
O. Ekre, T. Eliasson, H. Norrsell, P. Wahrborg, and C. Mannheimer
Long-term effects of spinal cord stimulation and coronary artery bypass grafting on quality of life and survival in the ESBY study
Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2002; 23(24): 1938 - 1945.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. Mannheimer, P. Camici, M.R. Chester, A. Collins, M. DeJongste, T. Eliasson, F. Follath, I. Hellemans, J. Herlitz, T. Luscher, et al.
The problem of chronic refractory angina. Report from the ESC Joint Study Group on the Treatment of Refractory Angina
Eur. Heart J., March 1, 2002; 23(5): 355 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
R. Moore and M. Chester
Neuromodulation for chronic refractory angina
Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2001; 59(1): 269 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. A. Gersbach, M. G. Hasdemir, E. Eeckhout, and L. K. von Segesser
Spinal cord stimulation treatment for angina pectoris: more than a placebo?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2001; 72(3): S1100 - 1104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
R. D. Foreman, B. Linderoth, J. L. Ardell, K. W. Barron, M.J. Chandler, S. S. Hull Jr., G. J. TerHorst, M. J.L. DeJongste, and J. A. Armour
Modulation of intrinsic cardiac neurons by spinal cord stimulation: implications for its therapeutic use in angina pectoris
Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2000; 47(2): 367 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. A. Lange and L. D. Hillis
Transmyocardial Laser Revascularization
N. Engl. J. Med., September 30, 1999; 341(14): 1074 - 1076.
[Full Text]


Home page
HeartHome page
I A M TenVaarwerk, G A J Jessurun, M J L DeJongste, C Andersen, C Mannheimer, T Eliasson, W Tadema, and M J Staal
Clinical outcome of patients treated with spinal cord stimulation for therapeutically refractory angina pectoris
Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 82 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. O. Cheng, C. Mannheimer, T. Eliasson, H. Norrsell, L.-E. Augustinsson, C. Blomtrand, H. Emanuelsson, S. Larsson, and A. Hjalmarson
Acupuncture for Relief of Angina • Response
Circulation, November 24, 1998; 98 (21): 2357 - 2358.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
T J Nurmikko, T P Nash, and J R Wiles
Recent advances: Control of chronic pain
BMJ, November 21, 1998; 317(7170): 1438 - 1441.
[Full Text]