This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nitta, T. Articles by Boineau, J. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nitta, T. Articles by Boineau, J. P.

(Circulation. 1998;97:1164-1175.)
© 1998 American Heart Association, Inc.

Basic Science Reports

Return Cycle Mapping After Entrainment of Ventricular Tachycardia

Takashi Nitta, MD; Richard B. Schuessler, PhD; Masataka Mitsuno, MD; Chris K. Rokkas, MD; Fumitaka Isobe, MD; Christopher S. Cronin, MD; James L. Cox, MD; ; John P. Boineau, MD

From the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Mo.

Correspondence to Richard B. Schuessler, PhD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Box 8234–3308 CSRB, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St Louis, MO 63110. E-mail rick{at}cts7.wustl.edu

Background—The central common pathway, which is the target for ablation in reentrant ventricular tachycardia, can be localized by entrainment mapping techniques. However, localization of the pathway is not always possible because of the elevated pacing threshold and the low voltage and fractionated potentials at the pathway. We examined whether return cycle mapping after entrainment localizes the pathway without pacing at the pathway or recording the potentials from the pathway and determined the required electrode resolution to localize the pathway.

Methods and Results—Epicardial mapping was performed with 253 unipolar electrodes during and after entrainment of 13 morphologies of ventricular tachycardia that were induced in dogs 4 days after infarction. The return cycle was calculated by subtracting the first activation time from the second activation time after the last stimulus and the return cycle distribution map was constructed for each stimulation site. The return cycle isochrones equal to the ventricular tachycardia cycle length converged on the lines of conduction block irrespective of the stimulation site, and the central common pathway was localized at the region between the intersections of the return cycle isochrones after entrainment from different stimulation sites. The potentials from the central common pathway were not required to localize the pathway, and the mapping accuracy did not change with or without analysis of the potentials from the pathway. According to the correlation between the electrode resolution and the mapping accuracy, an interelectrode distance of 8.5 mm was estimated as sufficient resolution for successful tachycardia termination during radiofrequency ablation guided by return cycle mapping.

Conclusions—Return cycle mapping after entrainment localizes the central common pathway without pacing at the pathway or recording the potentials from the pathway. This new mapping technique could improve the success rate of the ablative procedures.

Key Words: tachycardia • reentry • entrainment • mapping • ventricles

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Nitta, M. Mitsuno, C. K. Rokkas, R. Lee, R. B. Schuessler, and J. P. Boineau Cryoablation of ventricular tachycardia guided by return cycle mapping after entrainment J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2001; 121(2): 0249 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]